Autodesk两地同时起诉中望侵权 您持怎样观点?

发布人: 燕子发布时间: 2014-04-03 23:26浏览:6565总投票数:66
调查内容:

  日前,欧特克因侵害著作权和侵害技术秘密纠纷正式起诉中望软件及其关联机构。欧特克认为中望软件所开发的核心产品使用了未经授权的欧特克代码。有具体信息显示,2月7日,中望公司收到美国Autodesk公司的律师信;2月21日,中望公司收到庭审通知,Autodesk在荷兰海牙法庭起诉中望及中望荷兰、比利时代理;3月17日,一审在荷兰海牙法庭进行,并将于4月7日将宣判;3月26日,中望公司得知,在荷兰诉讼还没有结果的情况下,Autodesk公司已在美国再次提起诉讼,目前美国诉讼处于Hold状态,法庭还没有正式知会中望公司。原文链接:http://www.e-chuangke.com/show.php?id=115&i=0

  对于美国公司起诉中国公司软件侵权诉讼,在信息化领域内引起风波,说法不一。同时,对于在两个不同国家地区法院提起诉讼,业界也持不同观点。

  请亮出您旗帜鲜明的观点,当回判官!

新闻链接:

且看Autodesk在欧美两地同时起诉中望侵权:http://www.e-chuangke.com/show.php?id=116 

  —— 欧特克起诉中望CAD 称零容忍侵权等不当行为

  —— 关于中望与美国AUTODESK公司知识产权纠纷的情况说明原文链接:http://www.e-chuangke.com/show.php?id=115&i=6

原文链接:http://www.e-chuangke.com/show.php?id=115

Q1:您认为ZWCAD+是否对AutoCAD构成“侵害著作权和侵害技术秘密”?(单选)
  • 不是
  • 不懂,说不好
  • 不关心
Q2:您认为Autodesk在荷兰海牙法庭的起诉,会是哪种结果?(单选)
  • Autodesk胜诉
  • 中望胜诉
  • 达成调解协议
  • 其他结果
Q3:您认为Autodesk在美国加利福尼亚北部地区法院的起诉,会是哪种结果?(单选)
  • Autodesk胜诉
  • 中望胜诉
  • 达成调解协议
  • 其他结果
Q4:这场由Autodesk对中望发起的诉讼,您的判断是?(单选)
  • 可能ZWCAD+确实存在侵权
  • Autodesk诬告中望
  • 竞争对手之间的市场博弈所产生的行为
  • Autodesk公司试图打压和拖垮中望公司
  • 跨国公司惯用的技术手段
Q5:您认为这场官司是否影响中望CAD的市场销售?(单选)
  • 无论结果如何,中望软件的销售额肯定都会下降
  • 无论结果如何,对中望都不会有太大的影响
  • 如果确实没有侵权,反败为胜
  • 如果确有侵权行为,作为一款新产品ZWCAD+就死定了
Q6:无论结果如何,您支持哪一方?(单选)
  • 支持Autodesk及其AutoCAD
  • 支持中望及其ZWCAD+
  • 都支持
  • 都不支持
Q7:您对软件市场环境持怎样的观点?(单选)
  • 不要用极端的手段误导市场和客户
  • 所有公司都不要违背自由竞争市场原则
  • 不能容忍和接受侵占知识产权的不正当行为
  • 公司的所有行为都应当以用户的利益为准则
  
更多
评论
已有36人次参与评论,其中创客e族用户0人查看全部评论
  • 匿名网友  2015-09-08 16:37:56
  • 匿名网友  2014-12-24 18:58:00
    时间能检验一切!
  • 匿名网友  2014-04-12 01:41:42
    by Ralph Grabowski http://worldcadaccess.typepad.com/blog/2014/04/might-autodesk-sue-microsoft-over-an-obscure-hatching-bug.html Might Autodesk sue Microsoft over an obscure hatching bug? It began as a surefire, slam dunk anti-copying law suit, or so Autodesk thought. It had evidence that ZWSOFT of China copied source code from AutoCAD 2008, including code that exhibited a rare bug that occurrs only under a very specific editing procedure involving hatch patterns. The papers Autodesk filed in court listed other bugs as well, and noted that certain dialog boxes look identical in AutoCAD and ZWCAD+. Autodesk filed the suit in Den Hague, Holland because the court there is known to give same-day judgments. Autodesk had proof, albeit circumstantial, and it wanted the book thrown at ZWSOFT and its Dutch distributor: shut down sales, distribution, marketing, and assess lots of money for damages. The first sign of a setback for Autodesk came when the two judges said, This is more complex than it looks. They needed a couple of weeks to think about it, and then announced their decision on April 7. You didn't hear about any of this, because both sides agreed to keep it quiet, so as to not impair the reputation of ZWSOFT and its Dutch distributor -- should they be found not guilty. In the USA, however, Autodesk was plotting a second law suit, and its legal firm (Morrison & Foerster) filed with the Northern California court on March 26 -- ten days before the Dutch court's decision was released. The cat was out the bag, and I was able to report on the Dutch case. ZWSOFT, for its part, launched a marketing campaign to protect its reputation. For the reputation of the Dutch distributor, however, it is too late -- as he told me in several emotional emails. (You can read the full decision of the Dutch court at http://marketing.zwsoft.com/marketing/English_Verdict_from_District_Court_The_Hague.pdf. ) The court came to the following conclusions: the Dutch distributor of ZWCAD had no role in copying software, and so is exempt from the law suit Autodesk cannot claim copyright on dialog boxes similar-acting bugs are not definitive proof of copying; the proof can be found only in looking at the actual source code ZWSOFT must give a copy of all its ZWCAD+ source code to a mutually-acceptable third-party in China, and Autodesk must pay the cost The decision elated ZWSOFT and vindicated the Dutch distributor. In the USA, Autodesk has apparently put the second law suit on hold, sources tell me. Be sure that this week's decision in The Netherlands is provisional, and the case continues with the examination of the source code. The Twist The judges' decision hinged on this point: An expert witness for ZWSOFT showed that the same bugs appeared in versions of ZWCAD built on IntelliCAD. (Autodesk claimed the bugs appeared only in ZWCAD+, a "new, from-the-ground-up" version of the CAD software that ZWSOFT recoded in recent years.) There are two versions of ZWSOFT's software: ZWCAD is based on ITC code (up to version 2011) ZWCAD+ is based on code that ZWSOFT rewrote (as of version 2012) The outcome is a severe problem for Autodesk. The American company claims ZWSOFT purloined code from AutoCAD 2008, but the expert witness showed the same bug appears in versions of ZWCAD that shipped prior to 2008. It is not enough, however, for Autodesk to show that the bug appears in even earlier releases of AutoCAD. Here's why: The early versions of ZWCAD are based on legal code provided by the IntelliCAD Technical Consortium. ITC got its code from Visio, who got it from Boomerang Technologies, who got it from Autodesk (after the FTC forced Autodesk to give up the IntelliCAD code and coders), who got it accidentally when it acquired Softdesk, who wrote IntelliCADD secretly in fear of Autodesk cutting off access to its developer network, as it had done to another large third-party developer, Cyco International. (As a side note, ITC recently spent several feverous years removing all Microsoft-owned code from IntelliCAD, the result being a clean IntelliCAD 7. Neither ZWCAD nor ZWCAD+ are based on IntelliCAD 7.) Here's the nub: if ZWCAD appears to contain code copied from AutoCAD, then Microsoft is to blame, for it still is the copyright owner of the pre-IntelliCAD 7 source code upon which ZWCAD is based. (Now, it is possible that ZWSOFT added code to ZWCAD apart from what it got from ITC, but Autodesk did not allege this.) Microsoft got ownership of IntelliCAD when it bought Visio, but then it granted an exclusive license to ITC to market, sell, and improve the code. (History: Visio set up the ITC just months before it was bought by Microsoft, but retained the copyright to the source code, which is how Microsoft inherited it -- not ITC.) Microsoft has no interest in CAD, but it continues to own the copyright, curiously enough. So, if Autodesk is going to sue any AutoCAD workalike over the existence of a seemingly unique hatching bug, then it should sue Microsoft -- which it wouldn't dare.
  • 匿名网友  2014-04-10 17:04:55
    中望在荷兰法庭取得胜利 http://www.zwcad.com/about/press_center/press_releases/471.html
  • 匿名网友  2014-04-10 15:26:01
    刚看到信息中望胜诉了!
  • 匿名网友  2014-04-10 10:14:01
    哈,又一个被美国公司搞的中国公司。这TM完全是等级压制外加无耻守尸的节奏啊。 美国那嘴脸就是LZ等级高,玩你没商量,你想升级?问过LZ同意不同意没?你想做买卖赚钱?给LZ交保护费没? 你们中国这些二五八万还想翻天!?赶紧洗洗睡吧!
  • 匿名网友  2014-04-09 11:26:44
    刚刚看了下评论发现一个问题,里边有支持中望的有反对中望的,我是否可以理解支持国产的是中国人,不支持国产的是恶性竞争的产物。原因只有一点我们都是中国人,我们都爱我们的国家和企业。
  • 匿名网友  2014-04-05 13:48:28
    希望中望能够看到这些热爱国货、支持国产的同胞的心声,不要再辜负大家的期望了,正视剽窃代码的错误,给大家一个交代,给国产品牌一个交代,让我们支持国产,无愧于心。
  • 匿名网友  2014-04-04 21:46:53
    收拾你正常,在中国咋弄都不会管你,你到国际上争利他们肯定不干。放弃美国市场不要正面冲突。但是他们弓已经上玄。不容易善甘罢休!
  • 匿名网友  2014-04-04 20:38:49
    代码抄袭的可能性不大,autocad的代码中望不可能得到,但是国内山寨版CAD都是参照autocad的界面操作界面模仿进行的,只有高度相似高度兼容才能活下去,看这情况是中望山寨版的cad触动了autodesk的蛋糕了,中望要顶住,打倒欧特克。
  • 匿名网友  2014-04-04 17:54:30
    一群跳梁小丑,别再恶心人了,脸都被你们丢尽了。
  • 匿名网友  2014-04-04 17:39:31
    中望很无耻
  • 匿名网友  2014-04-04 17:22:36
    这只是欧特克的一种战略计划,打来打去,大家客观看待,不必太多担心!作为国人,当然支持国产,支持中望
  • 匿名网友  2014-04-04 17:18:14
    且行且清晰
  • 匿名网友  2014-04-04 17:15:41
    今天的中望经过多年的努力,已经崛起了,所以巨头才来关注...支持国产,支持中望!!
  • 匿名网友  2014-04-04 17:08:06
    作为编程开发人员的我,我们一个几十号人的小公司代码管控都非常严格。我想知道中望怎么剽窃AutoDesk远在美国研发中心的代码?尤其对于欧特克这种巨头,你以为这么容易能剽窃到他们的代码?开玩笑吧? 美国连德国总理默克尔都能够监控的国家,我觉得这件事应该是中望山寨威胁到了欧特克,想捏死中望。
  • 匿名网友  2014-04-04 17:07:44
    希望中望能够看到这些热爱国货、支持国产的同胞的心声,不要再辜负大家的期望了,正视剽窃代码的错误,给大家一个交代,给国产品牌一个交代,让我们支持国产,无愧于心。
  • 匿名网友  2014-04-04 16:54:27
    作为中国人肯定支持国货,但也要让我们理直气壮的支持啊。就这次事件来说,同意楼上的“苍蝇不叮无缝的蛋”,希望中望能证明自己没有“使用未经授权的欧特克代码”,否则不管结果如何,都会给中望甚至中国的名誉带来影响!
  • 匿名网友  2014-04-04 16:49:59
    正所谓无风不起浪,希望中望停止这种剽窃代码的行为,别在诋毁中国制造的形象了...
  • 匿名网友  2014-04-04 16:13:03
    顶起、楼上的,支持国产
导向调研
创客话题
导向专题
热搜标签
调查投票TOP10
调查热评TOP10
调查浏览TOP10
热评文章
热读文章